Legal operator
The responsible entity and sanitary/clinical director are identified. Brand names are connected to the accountable legal person or organization.
Subverification 03 · Site and process integrity
A clean-looking clinic is not a verified surgical facility.
This page explains how a surgeon’s facility infection-control verification works. It matches authorization to the exact operating address and service, then requires a continuous instrument-reprocessing demonstration—from contaminated return through release and storage.
Facility identity
The document must belong to this room, this address and this service.
We resolve the clinic’s legal entity, trading name, street address, operating site and represented service. In Mexico, COFEPRIS states that facilities performing surgical or obstetric procedures—including ambulatory surgery—require the applicable sanitary authorization. In Colombia, REPS provides the official record of enabled providers, sites, services and capacity.
Exact address
Map, exterior, interior and authorization details are reconciled. A directed walkthrough prevents substitution of photographs from another site.
Enabled service
The procedure and anesthesia level represented to the patient must fit the authorized or enabled service at that site.
Six-stage instrument pathway
One autoclave video proves only one moment.
The practice supplies a continuous, directed demonstration. The reviewer selects an instrument pathway and observes separation between dirty and clean work, personnel actions, device cycle evidence and release controls. Editing that removes transitions must be disclosed.
Contain and transport
Used instruments are safely contained, labeled where appropriate and moved without contaminating clean areas.
Clean
Visible soil is removed using the defined manual or mechanical process, chemistry, contact time and protective equipment.
Rinse, dry and inspect
Instruments are rinsed, dried, inspected for cleanliness, integrity and function, and removed from service when defective.
Package and label
Packaging fits the device and method; labels preserve cycle/load traceability and expiry or event-related sterility rules.
Sterilize and monitor
The correct validated cycle is selected. Physical, chemical and biological monitoring are reviewed according to the facility’s policy and applicable requirements.
Release, store and trace
A qualified person reviews the load before release; compromised packs are rejected; sterile storage and patient/load traceability are demonstrated.
Operational records
Process evidence must survive after the camera stops.
Policy, training and sampled records are compared. The practice must show how deviations are identified, affected instruments or patients are traced, loads are recalled where necessary, and corrective action is closed.
Daily controlCycle and release records
- Date, device, cycle/load number and selected parameters
- Physical readout and chemical indicator result
- Biological monitoring schedule and result where applicable
- Release decision and accountable person
- Failed-cycle quarantine and disposition
System controlCompetency and maintenance
- Role-specific staff training and observed competency
- Manufacturer instructions accessible to users
- Preventive maintenance, calibration and repair records
- Water/utility requirements where relevant
- Environmental cleaning and separation of dirty/clean zones
Failure conditions
Partial demonstrations are reported as partial.
A staged video may be useful evidence, but it is not treated as proof of routine adherence without records and a second check.
| Condition | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Facility authorization belongs to another address, operator or service. | Failed | The central facility claim does not match. |
| Only the sterilizer cycle is shown. | Limited | Cleaning, inspection, packaging, release, storage and traceability remain unverified. |
| Dirty and clean work cross without an explained control. | Material concern | The observed workflow may permit recontamination. |
| No load record or release decision can be tied to sampled instruments. | Cannot verify traceability | The process cannot be reconstructed. |
| Current policy and sampled records conflict. | Unresolved conflict | Written policy does not establish actual practice. |
Authority sources
Regulatory and public-health context.
The verification process is evidence-based and site-specific. It does not certify regulatory compliance on behalf of a government authority.
01
COFEPRIS · Establecimientos de Servicios de Salud
Official Mexico facility-authorization information.
02
Colombia · REPS
Official provider, site, service and capacity route.
03
WHO · Infection prevention and control
International patient-safety context for infection prevention.
04
CDC Yellow Book · Medical Tourism
Documented risks include surgical-site, blood-borne and antimicrobial-resistant infections.
Apply the standard
Ask us to examine a clinic’s evidence.
Supply the exact clinic name, address, contact information and proposed procedure.
Request verificationStandard issued 8 August 2026. It complements the detailed workflow at Evidence Gathering.