Source attribution
Every complaint, review, quotation, and screenshot remains attributed to the person or public platform that published it. Inclusion documents the submission; it does not convert an allegation into an independent finding.
ACTIVE STATUS: SUSPENDED INDEFINITELY. Verified Surgeons has received multiple patient-submitted reports concerning billing and professional conduct. Those claims are allegations from the submitters; they have not been independently adjudicated by Verified Surgeons. The subscription remains suspended while open cases are unresolved.
Everything on this page is reported as submitted to Verified Surgeons by the people who contacted us — over a dozen former patients, and the supporting evidence they provided. Verified Surgeons publishes only what these sources supplied and presents none of it as its own independent finding or conclusion. All names, claims, and documents remain the accounts of the individuals who submitted them.
Every complaint, review, quotation, and screenshot remains attributed to the person or public platform that published it. Inclusion documents the submission; it does not convert an allegation into an independent finding.
Read the capture date, visible context, source link, and caption together. Public pages can change, reviewers may disagree, and Verified Surgeons does not diagnose treatment outcomes from screenshots.
A person identified in the file may submit relevant records, a response, or a correction request through the complaint channel. Material changes should be dated and explained in the editorial record.
Patients should use this file as one input in a broader decision that also checks current credentials, facility authorization, informed consent, records, independent clinical advice, and aftercare.
This page documents attributed submissions and public-source material for informational and research purposes. It does not provide medical or legal advice, determine professional liability, or direct a reader to reach a clinical, regulatory, or legal conclusion. Readers should examine the linked sources, obtain current records, and consult qualified professionals before acting.
Patient accounts, quotations, ratings, and screenshots remain identified as statements from their submitters or source platforms. Publication does not mean Verified Surgeons adopts every statement as true.
A shared address, business name, or online association is treated as context unless independent evidence establishes responsibility. Missing records and unresolved contradictions remain visible.
The named clinician, clinic, reviewers, and other affected people may provide responsive documents or identify a specific factual error. Material responses and corrections are evaluated without payment or agreement with the complaint.
Unnecessary private identifiers should be redacted. Material may be limited, corrected, or removed when provenance cannot be established, lawful publication rights are unclear, or reliable evidence materially changes the record.
No safety guarantee or verdict: absence or presence of a complaint does not establish that a clinician is safe, unsafe, qualified, unqualified, liable, or free from liability. See the editorial policy, complaint standards, and privacy policy.
Materials submitted by the people who contacted us, published as received. Each item links to its original source; nothing here is presented as our own finding.
Public-review screenshots. The images below document public reviewer allegations and opinions; Verified Surgeons has not independently verified the claims in them.
Review text is shown at a readable size. On a small screen, scroll the image horizontally or select it to open the original-resolution file.
The source displayed an “AUTHOR CONFIRMED” label and a June 10, 2026 submission date. That label concerns the platform’s author-confirmation process; it does not prove the treatment or financial allegations.
“There was never anything refunded to me.”Read the attributed summary and evidence limits →Source reviewed August 3, 2026. The quoted words and allegations belong to the report author; inclusion is not an independent finding.
Public Yelp listing context and three expanded low-rated reviews shown together.
Complaint page attributed by the source to reviewer Michael K.
Direct screenshots of TripAdvisor posts 38, 44, and 67. Each image shows the author, post number, and complete visible post text.
“Be aware that Dr Jose Moguel proudly manufactures his own dental implants. Sounds impressive, right? Until you get home, need something done...”Open post page →Public-source screenshot captured July 30, 2026. The quoted words are the forum author’s allegation.
“Run he destroyed my mouth. I have a massive infection in my gums. My teeth have fallen out over 16 times.”Open post page →Public-source screenshot captured July 30, 2026. The quoted words are the forum author’s allegation.
“My experience was horrible. I Woke up during surgery. They gave me dentures that didn’t fit my mouth.”Open post page →Public-source screenshot captured July 30, 2026. The quoted words are the forum author’s allegation.
Aggregator rating distribution and the lowest review surfaced during capture.
Lowest-rated public reviews, captured in sequence so the complete visible text can be read.
A separate public listing at the same address, including two additional one-star reviews and its rating distribution. This address match is context only and is not presented as proof of common ownership.
Editorial record: page reviewed by the Verified Surgeons editorial team. Technical, accessibility, and content review updated 3 August 2026 to add Ripoff Report #1541926, the dedicated review-source record, and explicit publication safeguards. The stated scope, attribution, response rights, privacy limits, and correction process remain visible on the page.